Calc Function

  • Diagnosis
  • Rule Out
  • Prognosis
  • Formula
  • Treatment
  • Algorithm
  • Disease
    Select...
    Specialty
    Select...
    Chief Complaint
    Select...
    Organ System
    Select...

    Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer

    Based on guidelines from the European Association of Urology, also endorsed by ASCO.

    Diagnostic Evaluation

    Primary Assessment of Presumably Invasive Bladder Tumors

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Prognosis

    Comorbidity Scales

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Management

    Treatment Failure of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Preoperative Radiotherapy

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Nonresectable Tumors

    export-img
    N/A

    export-img
    N/A

    Bladder-sparing Treatments for Localized Disease

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Adjuvant Chemotherapy

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Metastatic Disease

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Biomarkers

    N/A
    export-img
    N/A

    Health-related Quality of Life

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Follow-up

    Local Recurrence, Poor Prognosis

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Distant Recurrence, Poor Prognosis

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Secondary Urethral Tumor

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    Strong recommendation
    export-img
    N/A

    How strong is the EAU's recommendation?

    Strong recommendation
    High confidence that recommendation reflects best practice, based on (1) strong evidence for true net effect (benefits > harms); (2) consistent results, with no or minor exceptions; (3) minor or no concerns about study quality; and/or (4) extent of panelists’ agreement.
    Moderate recommendation
    Moderate confidence that recommendation reflects best practice, based on (1) good evidence for true net effect (benefits > harms); (2) consistent results, with minor and/or few exceptions; (3) minor and/or few concerns about study quality; and/or (4) extent of panelists’ agreement.
    Some confidence that recommendation offers the best current guidance for practice, based on (1) limited evidence for true net effect (benefits > harms); (2) consistent results, but with important exceptions; (3) concerns about study quality; and/or (4) extent of panelists’ agreement.
    N/A
    No recommendation was assigned.
    High quality evidence
    High confidence that available evidence reflects true magnitude and direction of net effect (i.e., balance of benefits vs harms) and that further research is very unlikely to change either magnitude or direction of this net effect.
    Intermediate quality evidence
    Moderate confidence that available evidence reflects true magnitude and direction of net effect. Further research is unlikely to alter the direction of the net effect; however, it might alter the magnitude of the net effect.
    Low quality evidence
    Low confidence that available evidence reflects true magnitude and direction of the net effect. Further research may change either the magnitude and/or direction of this net effect.
    Insufficient evidence
    Evidence is insufficient to discern true magnitude and direction of net effect. Further research may better inform the topic. The use of the consensus opinion of experts is reasonable to inform outcomes related to the topic.
    N/A
    No evidence was assigned.