MDCalc

Diagnosis and Management of Barrett’s Esophagus

Official guideline from the American College of Gastroenterology.

These guideline summaries are shared for educational purposes only and are not intended to direct patient care. For detail on the specific recommendations and information about the evidence considered by the guideline developer, we encourage you to go to the original guideline statement cited below.

Diagnosis, Screening, and Surveillance

Diagnosis
Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

Diagnose Barrett's esophagus with salmon-colored mucosa >1 cm proximal to the GEJ + intestinal metaplasia on biopsy.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

Do not biopsy a normal Z-line or Z-line with <1 cm variability.

Conditional recommendation
Low quality evidence

Describe extent of metaplasia using Prague C&M Criteria.

Conditional recommendation
Low quality evidence

Characterize location of diaphragmatic hiatus, GEJ, and squamocolumnar junction.

Conditional recommendation
Low quality evidence

If suspected BE, take >8 random biopsies; if short-segment (1-2 cm), take >4 biopsies per circumferential cm + 1 biopsy per cm in “tongues”.

Conditional recommendation
Very low quality evidence

If diagnosis not made despite visual BE appearance, consider repeat EGD in 1-2 years.

Screening
Strong recommendation
Moderate quality evidence

Screen men with >5 years of weekly or more reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) + >2 risk factors (age >50, Caucasian, central obesity, current/former smoker, 1st degree family hx of BE/esophageal adenocarcinoma).

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

No routine screening recommended for women → lower risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma with chronic GER symptoms; consider screening if multiple risk factors.

Conditional recommendation
Low quality evidence

No routine screening recommended for the general population.

Strong recommendation
Very low quality evidence

Prior to screening, discuss possible implications of positive screen.

Conditional recommendation
Low quality evidence

Consider unsedated transnasal endoscopy as an alternative to EGD for BE screening.

Conditional recommendation
Low quality evidence

If negative screening test, no need to repeat; if esophagitis (LA Class B, C, D), perform repeat EGD in 8-12 weeks after PPI therapy to evaluate for BE.

Surveillance
Strong recommendation
Very low quality evidence

Discuss risks/benefits of surveillance prior to initiation.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

Survey with HD/high-resolution white light endoscopy.

Conditional recommendation
Very low quality evidence

Other imaging techniques not recommended for BE surveillance.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

If prior dysplasia→ 4-quadrant bx at 1 cm intervals; if no prior dysplasia→ 4-quadrant bx at 2 cm intervals.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

Sample mucosal abnormalities separately, with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) preferred; if BE with nodularity, refer to tertiary center for EMR.

Strong recommendation
Very low quality evidence

Do not biopsy areas of esophagitis until healed with PPI therapy.

Strong recommendation
Moderate quality evidence

Diagnosis of BE with dysplasia must be reviewed by 2 pathologists (at least 1 GI-related).

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

Biomarker use for risk stratification is not recommended.

Strong recommendation
Moderate quality evidence

If BE without dysplasia, survey every 3-5 years.

Conditional recommendation
Very low quality evidence

If BE without dysplasia, no need to repeat EGD in 1 year for surveillance.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

In cases of indefinite biopsy for dysplasia, repeat EGD after 3-6 mos of acid suppression, then yearly if indefinite for dysplasia confirmed.

Strong recommendation
Moderate quality evidence

If BE with low-grade dysplasia, endoscopic therapy preferred over yearly surveillance.

Strong recommendation
High quality evidence

If BE with high-grade dysplasia, proceed with endoscopic therapy unless life-threatening illness.

Therapy

Chemoprevention
Strong recommendation
Moderate quality evidence

Use daily PPI for all patients with BE; can use BID PPI if uncontrolled reflux symptoms.

Conditional recommendation
High quality evidence

Antineoplastic and chemopreventive strategies including ASA/NSAIDs not recommended.

Endoscopic
Strong recommendation
High quality evidence

If nodular mucosa, perform EMR using histology to guide further therapy decisions.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

Residual neoplasia should be assumed if neoplasia present at a deep margin post-EMR → surgical, systemic or additional endoscopic therapy should be considered.

Strong recommendation
Very low quality evidence

No role for routine endoscopic ablative therapies for nondysplastic BE → low-risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Strong recommendation
Moderate quality evidence

If T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma, endoscopic ablative therapy preferred.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

If T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma, multidisciplinary surgical oncology input recommended prior to endoscopic therapy; endoscopic therapy may be considered if superficial (sm1) disease without lymphovascular invasion.

Strong recommendation
Moderate quality evidence

If nodular BE, no benefit to staging with other modalities (i.e., EUS) prior to endoscopic mucosal resection.

Strong recommendation
Moderate quality evidence

If T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma, EUS may have a role in sampling regional lymph nodes.

Strong recommendation
Moderate quality evidence

If nonnodular dysplastic BE, radiofrequency ablation preferred.

Endoscopic Eradication Therapy
Strong recommendation
Very low quality evidence

Endoscopists who plan to practice ablative procedures should offer EMR.

Management After Endoscopy
Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

After complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM), continue interval surveillance.

Conditional recommendation
Low quality evidence

If high grade dysplasia/intramucosal carcinoma with CEIM, survey with EGD every 3 mos x 1 year, then every 6 mos x 1 year, then annually.

Conditional recommendation
Low quality evidence

If low grade dysplasia with CEIM, survey with EGD every 6 mos x 1 year, then annually.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

Inspect tubular esophagus + GEJ closely for mucosal abnormalities during surveillance EGD.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

If recurrence of BE, treat the same as if primary disease.

Conditional recommendation
Very low quality evidence

After CEIM, use medical therapy to control reflux symptoms or esophagitis.

Surgical
Strong recommendation
High quality evidence

Antireflux surgery not recommended for BE as antineoplastic therapy, but can be used as an adjunct to control reflux symptoms.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

If EAC with submucosal invasion, esophagectomy + consideration of neoadjuvant therapy preferredAntireflux surgery not recommended for BE as antineoplastic therapy, but can be used as an adjunct to control reflux symptoms.

Strong recommendation
Low quality evidence

Consider surgical and/or multimodality therapies for patients with T1a/T1b superficial EAC, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, or incomplete EMR.

Literature