Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Based on guidelines from AUA, ASCO, ASTRO, and SUO.
Initial Evaluation and Counseling
Evaluation
Prior to treatment consideration, a full history and physical exam should be performed, including an exam under anesthesia, at the time of transurethral resection of bladder tumor for a suspected invasive cancer.
Prior to muscle-invasive bladder cancer management, clinicians should perform a complete staging evaluation, including imaging of the chest and cross sectional imaging of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast if not contraindicated. Laboratory evaluation should include a comprehensive metabolic panel (complete blood count, liver function tests, alkaline phosphatase, and renal function).
An experienced genitourinary pathologist should review the pathology of a patient when variant histology is suspected or if muscle invasion is equivocal (e.g. micropapillary, nested, plasmacytoid, neuroendocrine, sarcomatoid, extensive squamous or glandular differentiation).
For patients with newly diagnosed muscle-invasive bladder cancer, curative treatment options should be discussed before determining a plan of therapy that is based on both patient comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Patient evaluation should be completed using a multidisciplinary approach.
Treatment
Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Utilizing a multidisciplinary approach, clinicians should offer cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy to eligible radical cystectomy patients prior to cystectomy.
Clinicians should not prescribe carboplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinically resectable stage cT2-T4aN0 bladder cancer. Patients ineligible for cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy should proceed to definitive locoregional therapy.
Clinicians should perform radical cystectomy as soon as possible following a patient’s completion of and recovery from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Radical Cystectomy
Clinicians should offer radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for surgically eligible patients with resectable non-metastatic (M0) muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
When performing a standard radical cystectomy, clinicians should remove the bladder, prostate, and seminal vesicles in males and should remove the bladder, uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, and anterior vaginal wall in females.
Urinary Diversion
In patients undergoing radical cystectomy, ileal conduit, continent cutaneous, and orthotopic neobladder urinary diversions should all be discussed.
Perioperative Surgical Management
Perioperative pharmacologic thromboembolic prophylaxis should be given to patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
In patients undergoing radical cystectomy µ-opioid antagonist therapy should be used to accelerate gastrointestinal recovery, unless contraindicated.
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy
Clinicians must perform a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the time of any surgery with curative intent.
Bladder Preserving Approaches
Patient Selection
For patients with newly diagnosed non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer who desire to retain their bladder, and for those with significant comorbidities for whom radical cystectomy is not a treatment option, clinicians should offer bladder preserving therapy when clinically appropriate.
Maximal TURBT and Partial Cystectomy
Primary Radiation Therapy
Multi-Modal Bladder Preserving Therapy
For patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who have elected multi-modal bladder preserving therapy, clinicians should offer maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor, chemotherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy, and planned cystoscopic reevaluation.
Radiation sensitizing chemotherapy regimens should include cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C.
Bladder Preserving Treatment Failure
In patients who are medically fit and have residual or recurrent muscle-invasive disease following bladder preserving therapy, clinicians should offer radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.
In patients who have a non-muscle invasive recurrence after bladder preserving therapy, clinicians may offer either local measures, such as transurethral resection of bladder tumor with intravesical therapy, or radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Surveillance and Follow Up
Imaging
Laboratory Values and Urine Markers
Following therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, patients should undergo laboratory assessment at three to six month intervals for two to three years and then annually thereafter.
Patient Survivorship
Clinicians should discuss with patients how they are coping with their bladder cancer diagnosis and treatment and should recommend that patients consider participating in cancer support groups or consider receiving individual counseling.
What do the icons mean?
How strong is the AUA, ASCO, ASTRO, and SUO's recommendation?
Strong recommendation
An action should (benefits outweigh risks/burdens) or should not (risks/burdens outweigh benefits) be undertaken because net benefit or net harm is substantial.Moderate recommendation
An action should (benefits outweigh risks/burdens) or should not (risks/burdens outweigh benefits) be undertaken because net benefit or net harm is moderate.Conditional recommendation
The evidence indicates that there is no apparent net benefit or harm or when the balance between benefits and risks/burden is unclear.Grade A quality evidence
The benefits and risks/burdens appear balanced, and the best action depends on patient circumstances. Future research is unlikely to change confidence. Grade B quality evidence
The benefits and risks/burdens appear balanced, and the best action depends on individual patient circumstances. Better evidence could change confidence. Grade C quality evidence
There is uncertainty regarding the balance between benefits and risks/burdens, and alternative strategies may be equally reasonable. Better evidence is likely to change confidence.Clinical principle
A statement about a component of clinical care that is widely agreed upon by urologists or other clinicians for which there may or may not be evidence in the medical literature.Expert opinion
A statement, achieved by consensus of the Panel, that is based on members' clinical training, experience, knowledge, and judgment for which there is no evidence.Literature