Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx
Based on guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
SCC of Oral Cavity (SCCOC)
Neck Dissection
For patients with SCCOC classified as cT2 to cT4, cN0—that is, no clinical nor radiographic evidence of metastatic spread to the neck—and treated with curative-intent surgery, an ipsilateral elective neck dissection should be performed.
For patients with SCCOC classified as cT1, cN0, an ipsilateral elective neck dissection should be performed. Alternatively, for selected highly reliable patients with cT1, cN0, close surveillance may be offered by a surgeon in conjunction with specialized neck ultrasound surveillance techniques.
For patients with a cN0 neck, an ipsilateral elective neck dissection should include nodal levels, Ia, Ib, II, and III. An adequate dissection should include at least 18 lymph nodes.
An ipsilateral therapeutic selective neck dissection for a clinically node-positive neck should include nodal levels Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb, III, and IV. An adequate dissection should include at least 18 lymph nodes. Dissection of level V may be offered in patients with multistation disease.
In patients with a clinically node-positive contralateral neck, contralateral neck dissection should be performed. In patients with a cN0 contralateral neck, an elective contralateral neck dissection may be offered in patients with a tumor of the oral tongue and/or floor of the mouth that is T3/4 or approaches midline.
Adjuvant Neck Radiotherapy
Adjuvant neck radiotherapy should not be administered to patients with pathologically node-negative or a single pathologically positive node without extranodal extension after high-quality neck dissection, unless there are indications from the primary tumor characteristics, such as perineural invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, or a T3/4 primary.
Adjuvant neck radiotherapy should be administered to patients with oral cavity cancer and a single pathologically positive node who did not undergo high-quality neck dissection.
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy using intravenous bolus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks should be offered to patients with oral cavity cancer and extranodal extension in any positive node, regardless of the extent of extranodal extension and the number or size of involved nodes, and no contraindications to high-dose cisplatin.
Concurrent weekly cisplatin may be administered with postoperative radiotherapy to patients who are considered inappropriate for standard high-dose intermittent cisplatin after a careful discussion of patient preferences and the limited evidence that supports this treatment schedule.
Neck Dissection vs Radiotherapy
Elective neck dissection is the preferred approach for patients with oral cavity cancer who require management of the clinically negative neck. Elective radiotherapy to a nondissected neck—50 to 56 Gy in 25 to 30 fractions—may be efficacious and should be administered if surgery is not feasible.
For patients who have undergone ipsilateral neck dissection only and are at substantial risk of contralateral nodal involvement—for example, tumor of the oral tongue and/or floor of the mouth that is T3/4 or approaches midline—contralateral neck radiotherapy should be administered to treat potential microscopic disease.
SCC of Oropharynx (SCCOP)
Neck Dissection
Patients with lateralized oropharyngeal carcinoma who are being treated with upfront curative surgery should undergo an ipsilateral neck dissection of levels II to IV. An adequate dissection should include at least 18 lymph nodes.
Patients with lateralized oropharyngeal cancer who undergo neck dissection concurrently or before transoral endoscopic head and neck surgery should have ligation of at-risk feeding blood vessels to reduce the severity and incidence of postoperative bleeding.
Patients with tumors that extend to the midline tongue base or palate or that involve the posterior oropharyngeal wall should have bilateral neck dissections performed unless bilateral adjuvant radiotherapy is planned. The multidisciplinary team should discuss with patients the potential functional impact of bilateral neck dissection and postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy.
Surgical vs Nonsurgical Approach
A nonsurgical approach should be offered to patients with clinically node-positive disease who have either unequivocal extranodal extension into surrounding soft tissues or carotid artery or cranial nerve involvement.
Neck Dissection Post-radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy
If PET/CT scan at 12 or more weeks after completion of radiation/chemoradiation shows intense fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in any node, the patient should undergo neck dissection if feasible. If PET/CT shows no nodal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and the patient has no abnormally enlarged lymph nodes, the patient should not have neck dissection.
Patients who complete radiation/chemoradiation and receive anatomic cross-sectional imaging—CT or magnetic resonance imaging scans—at 12 or more weeks post-therapy that shows resolution of previously abnormal lymph nodes should not undergo neck dissection.
If PET/CT scan at 12 or more weeks shows mild fluorodexoyglucose uptake in a node of 1 cm or less or a persistently enlarged node of 1 cm or more without either mild or intense fluorodexoyglucose uptake, that patient may be observed closely with serial cross-sectional imaging or PET/CT, with neck dissection reserved for clinical or radiographic concern for progressive disease.
What do the icons mean?
How strong is the ASCO's recommendation?
Strong recommendation
High confidence that recommendation reflects best practice, based on (1) strong evidence for true net effect (benefits > harms); (2) consistent results, with no or minor exceptions; (3) minor or no concerns about study quality; and/or (4) extent of panelists’ agreement.Moderate recommendation
Moderate confidence that recommendation reflects best practice, based on (1) good evidence for true net effect (benefits > harms); (2) consistent results, with minor and/or few exceptions; (3) minor and/or few concerns about study quality; and/or (4) extent of panelists’ agreement.Weak recommendation
Some confidence that recommendation offers the best current guidance for practice, based on (1) limited evidence for true net effect (benefits > harms); (2) consistent results, but with important exceptions; (3) concerns about study quality; and/or (4) extent of panelists’ agreement.High quality evidence
High confidence that available evidence reflects true magnitude and direction of net effect (i.e., balance of benefits vs harms) and that further research is very unlikely to change either magnitude or direction of this net effect.Intermediate quality evidence
Moderate confidence that available evidence reflects true magnitude and direction of net effect. Further research is unlikely to alter the direction of the net effect; however, it might alter the magnitude of the net effect.Low quality evidence
Low confidence that available evidence reflects true magnitude and direction of the net effect. Further research may change either the magnitude and/or direction of this net effect.Insufficient evidence
Evidence is insufficient to discern true magnitude and direction of net effect. Further research may better inform the topic. The use of the consensus opinion of experts is reasonable to inform outcomes related to the topic.