Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Official guideline of the American College of Gastroenterology.
Rule-out
Celiac Disease
IBD
We suggest that fecal calprotectin (or fecal lactoferrin) and C-reactive protein be checked in patients without alarm features and with suspected IBS and diarrhea symptoms to rule out inflammatory bowel disease. moderate quality of evidence for C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin.
Testing
Stool Testing
Colonoscopy
Food Allergies
Diagnostic Strategy
Diagnostic Strategy
We suggest a positive diagnostic strategy as compared to a diagnostic strategy of exclusion for patients with symptoms of IBS to improve time to initiate appropriate therapy.
IBS Categorization
IBS Subtypes
Global IBS
We recommend a limited trial of a low FODMAP diet in patients with IBS to improve global IBS symptoms.
We suggest that soluble, but not insoluble, fiber be used to treat global IBS symptoms.
We recommend against the use of antispasmodics for the treatment of global IBS symptoms.
We suggest the use of peppermint to provide relief of global IBS symptoms.
We suggest against probiotics for the treatment of global IBS symptoms.
We recommend that tricyclic antidepressants be used to treat global symptoms of IBS.
We suggest that gut-directed psychotherapies be used to treat global IBS symptoms.
IBS-C
We suggest against PEG products to relieve global IBS symptoms in those with IBS-C.
We recommend the use of chloride channel activators to treat global IBS-C symptoms.
We recommend the use of guanylate cyclase activators to treat global IBS-C symptoms.
IBS-D
We do not suggest the use of bile acid sequestrants to treat global IBS-D symptoms.
We recommend the use of rifaximin to treat global IBS-D symptoms.
We recommend that alosetron be used to relieve global IBS-D symptoms in women with severe symptoms who have failed conventional therapy.
What do the icons mean?
How strong is the ACG's recommendation?
Strong recommendation
Intervention's desirable effects clearly outweigh undesirable effects.Consensus recommendation
Strong/conditional recommendation
Conditional recommendation
Uncertainty in tradeoffs between desirable & undesirable effects of intervention.High quality evidence
Further research is unlikely to change the confidence in estimate of effect.Moderate quality evidence
Further research would be likely to have an impact on the confidence in the estimate of effect.Low quality evidence
Further research would be expected to have an impact on the confidence in the estimate of effect.Very low quality evidence
Any estimate of effect is very uncertain.Very low, moderate quality evidence
Very low for fecal lactoferrin, moderate for C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectinUnable to assess quality of evidence
Literature