Calc Function

    • Calcs that help predict probability of a diseaseDiagnosis
    • Subcategory of 'Diagnosis' designed to be very sensitiveRule Out
    • Disease is diagnosed: prognosticate to guide treatmentPrognosis
    • Numerical inputs and outputsFormula
    • Med treatment and moreTreatment
    • Suggested protocolsAlgorithm

    Disease

    Select...

    Specialty

    Select...

    Chief Complaint

    Select...

    Organ System

    Select...

    Patent Pending

    Rockall Score for Upper GI Bleeding (Pre-Endoscopy)

    Determines severity of GI bleeding, prior to endoscopy.
    Favorite

    BEFORE USE

    Use this score for upper GI bleed patients who have NOT yet had endoscopy. Use the Complete Rockall Score for patients who have had endoscopy.
    When to Use
    Pearls/Pitfalls
    Why Use

    Result:

    Please fill out required fields.

    Next Steps
    Evidence
    Creator Insights

    Advice

    • The Rockall Score predicts mortality better than does chance alone, but overall should be interpreted with caution—a score of ‘0’ in some studies suggested very low mortality, but in others was not a consistent indicator.
    • Other scores such as the Glasgow-Blatchford Score may perform better, particularly for identifying very low risk patients. According to the American College of Gastroenterology’s management guidelines for patients with overt upper GI bleeding, neither the Rockall nor Glasgow-Blatchford scores can reliably predict which individual patients will need an intervention, except for patients with a Glasgow-Blatchford Score of 0 (< 1% chance of requiring intervention).

    Management

    • Consider diagnostic endoscopy for patients with high risk of mortality from upper GI bleeding.
    • Consider ICU level of care for patients who are hemodynamically unstable from upper GI bleeding.
    • Note: The pre-endoscopy Rockall Score has not been shown to clearly identify individual patients who require intervention.

    Critical Actions

    Patients with a high mortality or risk of rebleeding should be considered for intervention and/or monitoring.

    Content Contributors